Smoke vs Vapor

Life or Death ... a Profitable Calculation

2012-07-23T11:15:00.000-07:00

For more information please stop in at my Smoke versus Vapor website

FDA smoke screen on e-cigarettes

Cigarette substitute produces no deadly smoke

Article By Dr. Elizabeth M. Whelan | Thursday, August 6, 2009 ... you can read her full article here it is extremely enlightening. Please also read the posting by Dr. Michael Siegal entitled "The Rest of The Story" posted August 7, you can find this posting here. It is important that the general public is aware of this controversy. Our Government needs to be informed so that this product is once again made available to the consumer. You'll find even more information regarding the recent and highly controversial border bans on my Media Updates page.

The question being asked is: "'Are electronic cigarettes safe?" ... let's change that to "Are electronic cigarettes much safer than traditional ones?'" ......... the answer ....... YES

The reason the electronic products are being pulled off shelves and banned at our borders is because our Government and Health Canada are so concerned for our safety and are worried about our health. Okay ... if you believe that one, you're gullible enough to believe almost anything.

They are advising those Canadians who have used e-cigarette products and are concerned about their health to consult with a health care practitioner. As it turns out the only concern they seem to face regarding their health, lies in the fact that they are no longer able to purchase this product and are being forced to return to the deadly tobacco products they were trying to rid themselves of.

Health Canada reminds us that it has authorized the sale of a number of legal smoking cessation aids, including nicotine gum, nicotine patches, nicotine inhaler and nicotine lozenges. Here's a tidbit of info for you ... detectable amounts of carcinogens are also present in nicotine replacement products such as Nicoderm CQ and Nicorette Gum although both are approved by the FDA and nitrosamines can also be found in food and beverage items such as bacon and beer.

This little piece of information I found though is where I believe the actual problem lies. Health Canada says that anyone selling, importing, or advertising electronic cigarette products in Canada "must stop doing so immediately." Appropriate establishment licenses issued by Health Canada are also needed prior to importing, and manufacturing electronic cigarettes. Rather than embracing a product that is a viable alternative to smoking ... a product that has already won the support of millions of consumers around the world, they have instead slammed the door shut. It's a matter of dollars and sense, if they aren't seeing the dollars ... it makes no sense.

Recently China began production of a product called the electronic cigarette, aka the e-cig or e-smoke. The e-cigarette closely imitates traditional smoking since it tastes, looks and also feels like a regular cigarette. When "smoking" the e-cigarette ... inhaling produces both the tactile and craving satisfactions which the traditional smoker seeks and generates a vaporizing process that releases a vapor mist that evaporates into the air within just a few seconds. Since the introduction of this product to the consumer marketplace, a number of new companies around the world, have started producing them in order to take advantage of the overwhelming positive response being generated by the consumer.

" In a July 22 news release, the FDA cited the detectable presence of carcinogens and "toxic chemicals" in a "small sample" of electronic cigarette cartridges as reason for alarm, singling out nitrosamines as particularly toxic. What the FDA fails to inform the public is that detectable amounts of carcinogens are also present in nicotine replacement products such as NicoDerm CQ and Nicorette gum, both approved by the FDA and nitrosamines can also be found in food items such bacon and beer. You can read up on carcinogens here ... one specific point that hasn't been mentioned by the alarmists, is the fact that temperature relates directly to the formation of carcinogens. One of the main reasons tobacco products are so toxic is the fact that they burn at temperatures between 450 and 850 degrees. The heat produced by the battery process in an electronic cigarette is between 20 and 40 degrees, so even if the electronic cigarette contained the same chemicals, the result would not be the same.

CTV.ca also covered this news story and you can access their full article here. "In an effort to move beyond cigarettes, tobacco companies have introduced a number of smokeless products to keep smokers as buyers of other items. They are trying to convert smokers to products such as moist snuff, chewing tobacco and snus -- teabag-like pouches that users stick between their cheek and gum.

R.J. Reynolds spokesman David Howard said the company is focused on being the "total tobacco company," pointing to its products like dissolvable tobacco, rather than technology like e-cigarettes.

Neither Reynolds nor Altria Group Inc.'s Philip Morris USA currently market electronic cigarettes.

Earlier this year, the FDA gained the authority to regulate tobacco products for the first time. However, the agency already could regulate electronic cigarettes because they do not actually contain tobacco."

The FDA's double standard and alarmist attitude has had the significant and unfortunate effect of inducing hysteria among the public, discouraging tobacco smokers from using a product which is thought to be a significantly safer alternative to traditional tobacco." You can read the entire article here and as a result, some of the electronic cigarette manufacturers are getting third party testing done and the results are in and being made public now. eSmoke has posted their results on their site and you can read them on their site here.

I believe that the electronic cigarette is ultimately set to dominate all other nicotine related products which have been introduced to the marketplace through the years and could very well be a cleaner, greener viable alternative to smoking. As such, this product also stands to divert a huge portion of the yearly tobacco profits our Governments see and could very well overtake the tobacco industry ... a market that has never really been challenged before. Here are some numbers for you to digest ... China is home to 300 million smokers who consume approximately 1.7 trillion cigarettes a year, that's 3 million cigarettes a minute. Worldwide, there are approximately 10 million cigarettes purchased a minute, 15 billion are sold each day and upwards of 5 trillion are produced and used on an annual basis.

Recently the Canadian Government placed a border ban on this product and I believe that the reasoning for doing so, has much more to do with the loss of profit rather than the health and welfare of Canadians. Federal health officials said Wednesday July 22, 2009 that they have found cancer-causing ingredients in electronic cigarettes, despite manufacturers' claims the products are safer than tobacco cigarettes. You can't help but notice the large bold headline "FDA says electronic cigarettes contain same cancer-causing ingredients as tobacco cigarettes" read the article here.

It was after reading this article, that I started to wonder what the motivations behind this decision really are. As we all know, cigarettes emit about 4,000 identifiable chemicals as they are smoked and at least 69 of those are known to cause cancer ... an electronic cigarette contains less than 10 to 20 chemicals on average, depending on the brand and strength purchased. Now, perhaps it's just me, but this double standard seems a bit ridiculous that the electronic cigarettes are being pulled off shelves and banned at our borders due to the "possible associated health risk," but yet the tobacco products remain available even though they have been aware of the "proven health risks" associated with these products for decades. I assume this means that the Canadian Government intends to remove ALL the tobacco products as well. (just a bit of witty sarcasm)

Although the electronic cigarette is marketed to smoking adults and is not available for minors to purchase, public health advocates have suggested that the electronic cigarettes are instead aimed at young people and they can serve as a "gateway" to tobacco smoking, since many come in flavors including chocolate, bubblegum and mint. "Tobacco industry research has demonstrated that fruit and candy flavors increase the social acceptance of cigarettes and curiosity to try the product," said Dr. Jonathan Winickoff, chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Tobacco Consortium.

There have been a few smoking cessation products which have hit the marketplace through the years, the most popular being the Nicorette product line, Nicorette®Gum, Nicorette®Inhaler and the Nicorette®Lozenge admittedly, these products have assisted many smokers to kick the habit. You can read up on this company on the Nicorette Additive page or visit the Canadian site here. I would however like to inform the aforementioned public health advocates that "gum" has always been a product "directly" aimed at our young people. One of the active ingredients in Nicorette®Gum is also nicotine, so the logical conclusion is that this product could also serve as a "gateway" to tobacco smoking. Perhaps this fact was overlooked, but one can't help but wonder how on earth they managed to sneak this dangerous product past the watchful, ever vigilant public health advocates, our Canadian Government and the Health Canada agency. By the way, I'm not sure if anyone else has noticed the irony, but Nicorette® Gum is available in 6 flavors ?

White Ice™ Mint—helps whiten teeth while you use it, coated for a cool mint flavor
Cinnamon Surge™—coated for an intense rush of bold cinnamon flavor
Fruit Chill™—coated twice for an intense fruit flavor with a hint of mint
FreshMint™—coated for a delicious burst of mint flavor
Mint
Original

and the Nicorette®Lozenge is available in 2 flavors

Mint
Cherry

Governments around the world have long been aware of the associated health risks caused by tobacco products, unfortunately for those of us that still smoke, the tobacco industry is one of the most lucrative ... reaping trillions of dollars annually, therefore they have and will continue to remain available to the consumer. It is a fact that the use of tobacco is the single largest cause of preventable deaths worldwide, but still contributes to approximately 5.4 million deaths from heart disease, stroke and other diseases annually. These figures are staggering.

Governments in Canada have been heavily involved in the tobacco industry for decades, by way of taxation, research and publicity. The Federal Government regulations, set out requirements for packaging that the tobacco companies are required to comply with. These include putting health warnings on all of our packages, which are drafted by the Federal Government. You can access the Health Canada website here, for more information regarding the dangers of smoking.

For over 80 years Imperial Tobacco Canada has been the largest Canadian tobacco producer. The ingredients disclosed by this company on their website which are used in the production of cigarettes are natural tobacco, water, a filter including tipping paper, cigarette paper, glue and ink. Menthol cigarettes also include menthol. The filter ingredients are potassium sorbate, cellulose diacetate, triacetin, mineral oil, titanium dioxide, sorbitan monolaureate and eloxylated sorbitan monolaureate. Paper manufacturers use the following ingredients cellulose, chalk, depolymerized guar gum, hydroxyethylated starch, potassium citrate, cationic starch, polyglycol ester in oil, polyvinyl alcohol and sodium alginate. Imperial Tobacco Canada utilizes two types of glue: polyvinyl acetate (an ingredient which is 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl phenylmethyl ester) and hot melt. Humectants glycerine (2.74%), invert sugar and propylene glycol are used to ensure freshness.

Toxic emissions relayed on the packaging on my preferred brand of cigarette sits at Tar 11-32 mg, Nicotine 1.1-2.5 mg, Carbon monoxide 12-30 mg, Formaldehyde 0.045-0.13 mg, Hydrogen cyanide 0.096-0.27 mg Benzene 0.042-0.093 mg and inside the pouch is another warning highlighted in yellow "Nicotine is a very addictive drug when delivered by a tobacco product"... I would personally like to thank both the Canadian Government and Health Canada for this very sincere gesture ... as I am reminded each time I light up, just how dangerous this product really is.

One quick reminder to the Anti-Smoking Groups, the Public Health Advocates, Health Canada and our Canadian Government who are all in favor of the border ban on the Electronic Cigarette Products ... the tobacco cigarettes have been shown to contain at least 57 known carcinogens at significant levels while the electronic cigarettes have not been shown to contain any carcinogens at more than trace levels.

Table 1. List of Identified, Known Carcinogens in Electronic Cigarettes, Present at More than Trace Levels (defined as 1 nanogram per cigarette)

None

Table 2. List of Identified, Known Carcinogens in Tobacco Cigarettes, Present at More than Trace Levels (defined as 1 nanogram per cigarette)

Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(j)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzo(a,l)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Quinolineb
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
Benzo(b)furan
Furan
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N -Nitrosoethylmethylamine
N -Nitrosodiethylamine
N -Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N -Nitrosopyrrolidine
N -Nitrosopiperidine
N -Nitrosodiethanolamine
N -Nitrosonornicotine
4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone
2-Toluidine
2,6-Dimethylaniline
2-Naphthylamine
4-Aminobiphenyl
AaC
PhIP
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
1,3-Butadiene
Isoprene
Benzene
Styrene
Acetamide
Acrylamide
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl chloride
DDT
DDE
Catechol
Caffeic acid
1,1-Dimethylhydrazine
2-Nitropropane
Nitrobenzene
Ethyl carbamate
Ethylene oxide
Propylene oxide
Methyleugenol
Hydrazine
Arsenic
Nickel
Chromium
Cadmium
Lead
Polonium-210

Consumer Health Products Canada

2009-08-09T18:58:00.000-07:00

Action Report - Spring/Summer 2009

SPRING/SUMMER 2009

Announcement: NDMAC has changed its name to
Consumer Health Products Canada. We are phasing in the change so look for a new masthead in
the next edition of the Action Report.

Modernizing the Food and Drugs Act

The Issue:

The intent behind the upcoming modernization of the Food and Drugs Act is to move towards a
relative risk framework for regulating therapeutic products. Consumer Health Products Canada supports this approach as it ties the
level of regulatory burden imposed on a product to the level of health risk posed by that product. The industry also sees this as
the opportunity to correct a long-standing inequity.

Currently, some consumer health products are regulated by the Natural Health Products Regulations,
while other consumer health products fall under the same regulatory framework as prescription drugs (i.e. Part C of the Food and
Drug Regulations). While both sets of products are assessed to be of lower risk, requiring one set of consumer health products
to meet the regulatory burden of prescription drugs is contrary to the intent of the new legislation and creates unnecessary and
unfair regulatory hurdles for consumer health products.

Consumer health products - regardless of the source of their ingredient - are lower risk than
prescription drugs and should not be subject to the same regulations.

Consumer Health Products Canada is asking the federal government to ensure that the amended
Food and Drugs Act includes a provision that all consumer health products will be regulated separately from prescription drugs,
thereby allowing the consistent regulation of all products intended for self-care.

What's New:

The intent of the Government of Canada's Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan is to create a new
legislative foundation to better protect Canadians from unsafe consumer, health and food products.
Bill C-6: the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act
(formerly Bill C-52), and the upcoming bill to amend the Food and Drugs Act are two key components
of this plan.

Bill C-6, which passed third reading in June and is now being reviewed by the Senate, will allow for
prompt and effective action when a danger to human health or safety exists, as well as prohibiting the supply of consumer products
that pose an unreasonable danger to human health or safety. The Government is in the process of drafting legislation to amend the
Food and Drugs Act, which could be tabled in the fall.

While Bill C-6 does not apply to consumer health products, many of the provisions contained in the
bill will also be included in the bill to amend the Food and Drugs Act.

Consumer Health Products Canada in Action:

For over ten years Consumer Health Products Canada has been working closely with departmental and
elected officials on legislative renewal. The Association has been advocating for the development of regulations for consumer
health products that are distinct from those for prescription products, thereby ensuring the consistent regulation of all health
products intended for self-care.

Given that government is drafting a bill to amend the Food and Drugs Act, CHP Canada has turned
up the heat and is asking that a provision to provide consistent regulation for consumer health products that is separate from
prescription drugs be included in the bill.

Over the course of the spring, CHP Canada successfully executed a coordinated communications campaign
with advertising and direct mail components that culminated with two Association lobby days on Parliament Hill in May. In meetings
with key elected officials and senior civil servants, CHP Canada members and staff received support for our request, including an
endorsement by senior departmental officials in a meeting with Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq.

CHP Canada also appeared as a witness during the Standing Committee on Health's study of Bill C-6.
While consumer health products are explicitly exempt from this proposed legislation, the Association intervened because expected
amendments to the Food and Drugs Act are likely to contain similar provisions. CHP Canada was successful in getting
amendments made so that, in the event that the minister of health deems it necessary to release confidential business information
to third parties (eg., because of a recall or other such serious event), the minister must notify the affected companies within one
business day of the release of the information (the original Bill did not provide for any notice). The Bill was also amended to
ensure that only confidential business information that is crucial to the protection of public health can be released.

What you can do:

This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to influence the fundamental structures underpinning the
regulation of our industry's products. It is critical that CHP Canada member companies and the rest of the consumer health products
industry become actively involved in supporting and asking the government to include in their amendments to the Food and Drugs
Act a provision for ensuring that all consumer health products will be regulated separately from prescription drugs.

The bill is not expected to be tabled until the fall. Until then:

1. Write to and meet with your local MP at some point during the summer and
emphasize:

The consumer health products industry is very supportive of modernizing the Food and Drugs Act
and are looking forward to seeing the bill tabled in the near future.

We are hopeful that it will set the legislative basis for implementing a risk-based regulatory
framework (i.e., that the degree of regulatory oversight of a product will be appropriate to the degree of the potential risk of
the product).

We also hope that the bill will provide the legislative basis for ensuring that all consumer health
products will be regulated separately from prescription drugs.

We continue to be supportive of Parliament's actions in 2004 to remove natural health products from
the prescription drug regulations. We wish to preserve the separate regulation of NHPs, and seek the creation of new regulations for
other consumer health products that reflect their lower risk nature and are outside Part C of the Food and Drug Regulations.

CHP Canada has materials that you can use to visually demonstrate the current inconsistency in the
regulations. To obtain your "Know the Difference, Then Make a Difference" campaign kit, please contact
Mary McEwen.

Tip: The MPs will be in their ridings throughout the summer.
We recommend that you meet with them in their constituency offices to specifically discuss this need and that you watch for
opportunities to meet them in your community, such as at their fundraisers, community events, etc.

2. Spend the summer determining how other potential amendments, such as the
handling of confidential business information, the powers of the Minister and inspectors, product life cycle regulation, etc.,
could affect your company and the different corporate divisions of your companies (e.g. pharma and personal care product divisions)
and work on developing some general corporate positions on these issues. Please share your thoughts on these issues with CHP Canada
by September.

Tip: Review Bill C-6
and the former Bill C-51
for ideas of how the new bill on the Food and Drugs Act will stand such issues as the handling of confidential business
information, the powers of the Minister and inspectors, product life cycle regulation, etc.

Resources:

Know the Difference, Make a Difference campaign website

Find your Member of Parliament

Government of Canada's Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan

Background: How does Health Canada determine which regulations to
apply to which products?

Health Canada applies a series of criteria to determine whether or not a product requires the
prescription of a health professional in order to be used safely and effectively. If the product is captured by these risk criteria,
regardless of whether the active ingredients are naturally occurring or synthetic, it will be classified as a prescription drug and
regulated under Part C of the Food and Drug Regulations. If, on the other hand, the product falls outside those risk criteria,
the regulations to which it will be subject depends on whether or not the active ingredients are found in nature. Products that are
naturally occurring will fall under the Natural Health Products Regulations and those that are not will be placed under Part C,
just like prescription drugs.

Background: What is the problem with having some consumer
health products regulated by the same regulations as prescription drugs and others by the Natural Health Products Regulations?

Part C of the Food and Drug Regulations includes, under Division 8, a requirement that all "new"
drugs (using new chemical entities) be subject to extensive premarket authorization review in a New Drug Submission (NDS). New
consumer health products are not generally pulled into Division 8; however, there is one provision that indiscriminately pulls
low risk consumer health products into "new drug status," and that is when a company combines two or more well established
ingredients into a new formulation/product that has never been marketed in Canada before. For higher risk prescription drugs,
this provision makes sense as the potential for serious drug interactions is one of the criteria that can keep an ingredient in
prescription-only status. For consumer health products that combine ingredients that both have broad safety margins and have
already been established as having a very low potential for clinically significant interactions, it makes no sense at all. The
prohibitively high costs and excessive regulatory burdens are barriers to the development of new products for self-care, which is
proven to be one way to reduce costs on the formal health care system.

By contrast, the Natural Health Products Regulations take an approach to novel formulations or
uses that is far more appropriate to low-risk consumer health products. In fact, this particular issue was the single most important
factor behind the creation of the NHP regulations.

CHP Canada Contacts:

Gerry Harrington, Director of Public Affairs

Mary McEwen, Director of Communications & Member
Services

Copyright 2009 by Consumer Health Products Canada. Action Report is published four times a year. It is designed to increase awareness of specific issues that have a direct
impact on the consumer health products industry.

CHP Canada/NDMAC HOME PAGE

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2C 3T2

Tel.: 1-613-723-0777 Fax: 1-613-723-0779 info@chpcanada.ca

Managing Editor: Kelly Tchorewski

2009-08-08T21:32:00.000-07:00

These postings are from

The Rest of the Story:

Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary

..Providing the whole story behind tobacco news.

By
Dr Michael Siegel Boston, Massachusetts

I am a physician who specialized in preventive medicine and public health. I am now a professor in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health. I have 20 years of experience in tobacco control, primarily as a researcher. My areas of research interest include the health effects of secondhand smoke, policy aspects of regulating smoking in public places, effects of cigarette marketing on youth smoking behavior, and the evaluation of tobacco control program and policy interventions.

Friday, August 07, 2009

Experiences of Electronic Cigarette Users Suggest that These Could Be Life-Saving Devices and that They are Effective for Smoking Cessation

While I agree that there is a need for research into the relative safety and effectiveness of electronic cigarettes, there is also a need for anti-smoking groups and the FDA to study the experience of electronic cigarette users with this product. The passionate testimonials of hundreds of electronic cigarette users suggest that these devices are effective in helping smokers to quit and stay off cigarettes.

I challenge the anti-smoking groups and the FDA to read all of these comments and then to reiterate their position that electronic cigarettes must be taken off the market.

These are all the comments from electronic cigarette users in response to Dr. Whelan's Washington Times op-ed piece. They are taken from the Washington Times site as well as the Digg site for this article. I have not omitted any comments from electronic cigarette users, which is remarkable because there is not a single comment from a user who has not found these devices to be effective in smoking cessation.

The Rest of the Story

"I smoked traditional cigarettes for 27 years.... 2+ packs a day. On June 11th, my first e-cigarette starter kit arrived in the mail. I opened it up and started using it. I have not had a traditional cigarette since that day!! Even if there are some risks associated with these products, it can NEVER be as dangerous as traditional cigarettes so WHY would the FDA (or anyone else) want to stop me and other smokers from using them??? THANK YOU Dr. Whelan for putting this in proper perspective!!"

"Do not allow this product to be taken off the market. It saved my life (my smoker's morning cough disappeared in 3 days after switching to an e-cig) and many thousands more. The FDA is being unbelievably hypocritical in this matter and it shows how politics and money, rather then genuine concern for public health, is behind everything they do. And this is coing from a registered Pharmacist."

"E-cigarettes (also known as Personal Vaporizers) got me off smoking after 20 + years. They're a miracle IMO. The deeply flawed FDA study is being used as a propaganda tool to mislead people about these devices. Their implication that e-cigarettes are just as dangerous as traditional smoking is absolutely incorrect. E-cigarettes save lives."

"E-Cigarette got me off 2 pack a day habit."

"I was a 30+ yr. smoker. None of the other stop smoking aids ever helped me. My blood pressure was out of control. After 8 days of use I was able to stop smoking entirely and my blood pressure has come down substantially. I've been smoke free for 3 months now. I think it would be a travesty to take these away from thousands of people and tell them to go back to smoking."

"I still have a pack of Marlboro cigarettes unsmoked since I took a first puff of these 2 weeks ago. To take them off the market would be a horrible idea and drive many smokers back. Of course tobacco companies and governments stand to lose billions in revenues if these catch on... and they will... so expect to see everything thrown at these new e-cigarette startups to stop this trend."

"I have smoked for nearly 20 years and NEVER went a day without smoking at least a full pack of smokes. Ever since I got my E-cig (3 weeks ago), I never had another reg cig since... I feel better, breathe better, sleep better and thats just to name a few. These are choices we made, please don't take these life changing choices from us!"

"I haven't smoked a tobacco cigarette in over 20 days thanks to the e-cigarette. Nothing else worked before. If this device becomes illegal, it will cause me to go back to using tobacco products or get a prescription to aid in my addiction which has more harmful side effects. Spread the word, this device is helping people lead healthier lives."

"Many of us, e_smokers, would have to go back to smoking regular cigarettes and harm not only yourself but non-smokers too with second hand smoke, increase health insurance cost and so on..."

"I use electronic cigarettes and have cut my consumption of tobacco cigs from a pack a day for 40 years to 1-5 cigarettes a day. I actually now prefer electronic cigarettes, and in the process have gone from thousands of chemicals in smoked tobacco to about 4 in e cigs. Do the math."

"I was smoking the traditional cigarettes for 20 years until I heard about the electronic cigarette. I have not touched a traditional CANCER stick in over 4 months, and I have slowly reduced my nicotine down to the lowest strength. I believe the FDA is working hard on this situation, my main question is, who are they working for. It makes no sense to stop an obvious safer alternative, for the ones they are trying to push us back on that kills over 450,000 people a year."

"I too smoked cigs for 25 years. I bought myself a kit, started "vaping" and haven't looked back."

"Almost 45 years a smoker at better than two packs a day. In less than two days I got rid of the wheezing, coughing and my tobacco cigarette intake dropped to less than five a day and falling. Someone in the FDA needs to see that there is a difference between trace elements of a carcinogen found in the e liquid (the vaporized liquid wasn't even tested by them) and the 60 some know heavy dosages of carcinogens found in cigarettes."

"I was a smoker for 10 years, tried to quit dozens of times. This product is the only thing that has made it possible for me to quit. Please don't ban e-cigs."

"I don't use e-cigs as a smoking cessation device. They are not for smoking cessation, although, many have quit smoking because they have this alternative. It is a much safer alternative, than inhaling 4000 chemicals the tobacco companies only recently admitted to. This is an alternative. I quit smoking over 3 months ago, prior to using an e-cig. I found that I missed the ritual, much like I'd miss having a cup of coffee in the morning. If for some reason I couldn't drink coffee anymore, I might have a cup of tea, or perhaps some other warm drink in my cup. Why on Earth couldn't I have an alternative to a deadly cigarette? Now I have come to know, after talking and listening to many people who have been using e-cigs, that they are very concerned over the safety of what is being inhaled, so much so, that they'd rather use this, than buy what they know is infinitely more harmful, tobacco cigarettes. Many are also not "vaping" nicotine at all!

When I smoked about 2 pack of cigarettes a day, I was wheezing, out of breath, and feeling horrible. The one room I smoked in was covered with tar, and smelled terrible. Since using the e-cig, there is no smell, I have no wheezing, I don't feel sick. There is no second hand smoke to keep from my family."

"I smoked for 25 years, and tried to quit (and failed) at least 5 times. My e-cig made it so easy. It took between 1 and 2 weeks, but the desire for a regular cigarette just melted away. You have to actually want to quit--but if you do, these things make it SO EASY!!! I haven't had a real one in 8 months and I don't miss them at all."

"I started smoking at age 19. From there, I smoked for 9 years until I was 28. I considered myself a casual / light smoker. A pack of lights or ultra-lights would last me about a week/week and a half. It was easy to switch over to e-cigs. Haven't touched a cigarette since. I love my e-cig."

"Massive Harm Reduction! 30 years of smoking cigarettes and now an alternative that works."

"I'll throw my 2 cents in to say e-cigs enabled me to quit after many many years of smoking. I thought I'd never be able to quit. These things are fantastic as a cigarette replacement. Still addicted to nicotine but nothing like the addiction I had when the delivery system was a cigarette."

"Great to read something positive about E-Cigarettes. I've been using this product for about 6 months and I have completely quit smoking cigarettes. I didn't even purchase this product for that- I was just curious. I found that the urge to smoke disappeared completely within a week of using this product. It makes me sick to think that the FDA could be so negative about a product that could potentially save millions of Americans from death."

"My wife and (Me 30yr smoker her 6yr smoker) have tried everything patches gums pills cold turkey and nothing has worked until now. We plan to quit within 3 months not long term."

"We are no longer smoking ANY tobacco cigarettes and feel great. We have already dropped from 24mg to 18mg and plan to keep going until finished with nicotine. we then may choose to use 0mg for as long as it takes to loose the psychological addiction. That is the real tough nut. I quit for a year once and went back. If I had the e-cig I would have used them and not gone back to the real cigarettes resulting in an additional 10 years of smoking."

"Thank you Dr Whelan. As corny as it sounds I almost cried when I read this. We as a people have been bombarded with the false claims of the FDA on this device, however, I truly feel it can save my life. I have tried every cessation method out there with no success until the ecig. I am a former two pack a day smoker and have not even looked back."

"I’ve been a life long cigarette smoker (35 years) whom has unsuccessfully attempted to quit many times. After the failure of the patch, nicotine gum, prescription drugs and cold turkey attempts; I have the e-cigarette to thank for my success."

"I have smoked for 20 years and have been 5 months now tobacco free because of e cigarettes. I have not touched a real cigarette since the day I received my electronic cigarette. Before that, NOTHING could get me off the tobacco cigarettes. I am taking in very low doses of nicotine and have reduced my nicotine immensely. The e cigarette has changed my life and I will never go back to smoking again. This is a crime to try and take this away from me. Without a doubt I know that what I am doing is WAY safer than smoking real cigarettes. SHAME on the FDA for what they are trying to do to us while they sit there and allow real tobacco known and proven cancer causing cancer sticks."

"These devices are a miracle. I tried everything to quit. Nothing worked. I quit cigarettes on the first day with ecigs. I am an adult. This is my choice and no one elses. Why would you force someone to go back to cigarettes?"

"After using an e-cigarette for 4months and 5 days, the only side effect I can report is I have been tobacco free all that time. I didn't buy it to quit smoking; I bought it to cut back my usage a little. NEVER would I have expected this to take the place of my tabacco cigarettes! And yes; I've used the patch, gum, drugs, candy sticks - all those APPROVED methods. I've 'suffered' with smoking for over 25 years. Is this the same as smoking? Well, when I asked my Dr, he said "*ell no! Congrats! you are now a NON SMOKER!""

"After 25 yrs of smoking, I have finally found something to get me off of the tobacco, tar, carcinogens and fire."

"I was an analog cigarette addict for 40 years. Forty Years. for Forty years, I was degraded and looked down upon by co-workers, even fired from one job by a boss who swore I 'smelled like cigarettes'. I've been subjected to restriction to designated smoking areas which are unsafe, poorly maintained, inconvenient and invariably exposed to the elements. I've been penalized by health insurance companies with higher premiums, even tho I've never been sick. I've been taxed exorbitantly by a government who capitalizes on my addiction. I've been lied to by Big Tobacco about what's in their product. I've been ripped off by Big Pharm with their snake-oil cessation products with alarming side-effects that invariably do more harm than good. And then I found the e-cigarette. And ended my days of paying up to $3/day/pack in taxes. For Forty Years. Ended my days of being analog cigarette dependent. My self-esteem is back. I haven't picked up a Big Tobacco cigarette in a month. for the first time in Fourty years. I may still die from 40 years of smoking, but at least I won't be surrounded by cigarette butts and ashtrays and I will have finally kicked my addiction. e-cigarettes save lives."

"I smoked for 25 years. Last year April I found out about the e-cigarette, started using them and I had my last real cigarette July 20th. of last year. So thankfully I am a nonsmoker now for over a year. I will never go back to smoking, will stick around for vaping. I feel better, I don't have a smokers cough anymore, I have more energy. Most people who quit smoking will gain weight. I have not even gained one pound. Also I have been saving a lot of money by not having to spend $ 4.00 on a pack of cigarettes. All in all it's a winner."

"I use a device called the electronic cigarette as a part of a personal harm reduction strategy, and it has helped me to break my 30+ year addiction to tobacco cigarettes. This device contains absolutely no tobacco and creates no smoke, yet provides some of the chemical, physical and psychological aspects of smoking without the deadly effects of a tobacco cigarette. I wish I had never made the foolish decision to smoke as a youngster. My wife of twenty years has never seen me without a cigarette in my hand. I can find very few family photographs that do not show me with a cigarette in my hand. I was completely addicted to tobacco. Two days after I chose to begin using an electronic cigarette with a fluid containing propylene glycol, water, flavorings and nicotine (optional component), I stopped smoking tobacco. I breathe easier, my sense of taste and smell has greatly improved and I no longer reek like an ashtray! Am I now addicted to another device, perhaps; but I am damn comfortable with my decision to inhale nicotine (think nicotine inhalers from drug companies) and propylene glycol (think theater fog). I can control my nicotine intake, I have the option to gradually reduce my nicotine intake and will trust my body to tell me if I am doing something wrong or harmful. My other recourse was to continue to burn thousands of chemicals in tobacco while I wheezed and coughed my way to death. I chose to make a change and the electronic cigarette has improved my life."

"I smoked for 45 years, tried to quit several times only to fail again. I discovered ecigs and within 14 days I quit, I have not touched a cigarette now for six months. I have no desire to smoke tobacco, in fact find it utterly repulsive now. This option could improve the lives of a lot of people not to mention health related cost savings."

"I have been perfectly content since stopping all analogs from day one after my e-cig arrived. A little on the jittery side for the first couple months, and after I switched away from PG to VG, I am now really content, no more jitters, if fact, so content that almost 3 weeks ago now I dropped the nicotine density of my juice from 24mg/ml down to 18mg/ml, with no side effects whatsoever! I find that fascinating, how can that happen when it never happened that way with analogs...if I cut down, I was a physical and mental MESS!!! So what is the secret? It's just a bad system? Tell that to the Doc that just published that article in the Wash Times! She seems to think it's a great idea. AND, that is why these tests have been valuable to me. I wanted to know the truth about what I was actually pulling into my body. And oh yes I was pulling nicotine into my body, and true to the testing done by Ruyan group, it is exponentially lower than when compared to a tobacco cigarette! That was the whole idea! And, if it quenches the god-awful withdrawal side effects of conventional and FDA approved NRT's (nicotine replacement therapy) PLUS gives the person using the options each individual needs to be able to stop smoking cigarettes, Lo and Behold, it has proven itself to be the very BEST kind of NRT. We're happy, this bunch, for some it may be just something new to do, but for me it was for quality of Life and removal of toxins and poisons that I knew and have known for a long time would eventually cause my death! That's pretty powerful, to me. I am now feeling more alive than I have at any time during my 44 years of smoking tobacco cigarettes."

"I have been using the e-cigarette for two months now with no side-effects and with almost no nicotine. I was almost a pack a day smoker and have no desire to go back to cancer sticks. Actually I take that back - I have had side effects, like being able to run without getting winded, more energy, and a better sense of taste/smell. I find the FDA's objections to the e-cigarette to be highly questionable."

"I smoked for 45 years one and half packs a day. Tried to quit numerous times and failed. I discovered ecigs and within 14 days I quit completely and have not had a desire to go back. This could improve the lives of many not to mention health related cost savings."

"I was a 1 1/2 to 2 pack a day smoker for over 40 years. When I first tried e-cigs it was to try to slow down on my tobacco cigarette smoking. My smokers cough was out of control. I coughed and hacked all the time, night and day. After about a week on e-cigs the cough was GONE!! I didn't start out to stop smoking, but it happened. I feel so much better! I can breath again. My sense of smell and taste have returned an I don't smell like cigarettes anymore. I don't need a lighter on me all the time and I don't need ashtrays either."

"I have been a smoker for 25 years and with the e-cigs I have been able to quit smoking real cigarettes. I am so grateful for this story I could really tear up."

"In this decade it's been nearly impossible to find honesty coming from a news source. Now that I can finally breath again since switching to e-cigs 5 months ago, I can truly appreciate a breath of fresh air."

"After 25 years of smoking, and at least 5 failed attempts to quit, I finally did it with my electric cigarette. And it was so incredibly easy, I didn't realize I was doing it--the urge to smoke real cigarettes just fell away over the first week or two I had it. Patches, gum, willpower, and Alan Carr all failed me, but this actually worked."

"I, too, smoked those "nasty stinkies" (tobacco cigarettes) for 40 years, tried all of the "smoking cessation" rip-offs, to no avail, until 9 months ago, when I bought my first E-Cig...2 1/2 weeks later, I had smoked my last tobacco cigarette! Now, 9 months later, I never would have imagined I would feel this good & healthy at the age of 60. I thank God for the invention of the electronic cigarette. Please, God, don't let them take THIS away from us. We want to live."

"I have not had a cigarette for 7 months. I detest the smell of them. I can't believe I smoked for so long. I started out with medium strength, then went to low, and I am now at extra low. I have not coughed in months. I no longer hear myself wheezing in bed. If the ecig has done all this for me, how can it be bad?"

"I have used e-cigarettes for over a year and have experienced health benefit from using them personally. I have had major health problems and the NRT's currently available, did not help and caused side effects. I hope more Doctors, join in this fight for harm reduction in using e-cigarettes."

"After 37 yrs of cigarette addiction, and many unsuccessful attempts to quit; it was only e-cigs that actually enabled me to give up smoking. This product has saved my life. It gets even better. Within a few weeks of using this product, I was down to level ZERO with the nicotine. There were no side effects. That suggests to me that my addiction was more in the mechanics of smoking."

"I smoked for 25 years, and tried to quit (and failed) at least 5 times. My e-cig made it so easy. It took between 1 and 2 weeks, but the desire for a regular cigarette just melted away. You have to actually want to quit--but if you do, these things make it SO EASY!!! I haven't had a real one in 8 months and I don't miss them at all."

"I smoked for 32 years and have been using the E-Cig for 2 months. I really needed to quit because I have Diabetes and other health problems. The Doctor said I was "a ticking time bomb" for stroke or heart attack. NOW? My blood pressure is back to where it was 32 YEARS AGO!! And my lungs were described by my Doc as "wonderful" I feel so much better. Thanks to a PV I have not polluted the air around me for almost 3 months. I did not buy this devise with the intention of quitting tobacco cigarettes, I was tired of being forced outdoors in all weather to feed my addiction. Within 2 weeks I was tobacco free by accident."

"I bought my first ecig last Friday. One week without a cigarette! I breathe better, I smell better, and I am excited and hopeful for a better future!"

"I quit smoking real cigarettes from the very first day after being a pack a day smoker. I can breathe again. I can smell again, I'm not as tired either."

There are many more posts on many different sites ... it's time to lift the ban.

2009-08-08T20:09:00.000-07:00

eSmoke Cartridges - Lab Tested and Diethylene Glycol free!

In response to the recent FDA report that found Diethylene Glycol in cartridges from our competitiors. We are pleased to announce that a recent third party analysis of the eSmoke cartridges was found to be free of DEG.

The FDA's report also backed up it's initial statement that e-cigarettes are no safer than real ones in an attempt to scare electronic cigarette users into returning to real cigarettes by alarming them about the carcinogens detected in the product, without telling them that that the levels were no higher than in nicotine replacement products and that they are 1400 times lower than in Marlboros.

Dr. Michael Siegel, a professor in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health with over 20 years of experience in tobacco control, primarily as a researcher stated in his blog titled "The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary" the levels of carcinogens found in the Electronic Cigarette compared to traditional FDA approved NRTs and real cigarettes. His numbers based on scientific findings showed the following:

Maximum Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamine Levels in Various Cigarettes and Nicotine-Delivery Products (ng/g, except for nicotine gum and patch which are ng/patch or ng/gum piece)
Product	NNN	NNK	NAT	NAB	Total
Electronic Cigarette	3.87	1.46	2.16	0.693	8.183
Nicotine Gum	2.0	ND	ND	ND	2.0
Nicotine Patch	ND	8.0	ND	ND	8.0
Swedish Snus					2,400
Winston	2200	580	560	25	3365
Newport	1100	830	1900	55	3885
Camel	3100	1400	2800	150	7450
Skoal	4500	470	4100	220	9290
Marlboro	4300	1800	4900	190	11190

You can read the full article by Dr. Michael Siegel by clicking here

In another recent article in the Washington Times by Dr. Elizabeth Whelan who is the president of the American Council on Science and Health, Dr Whelan bashes the FDA's scare tactics about the electronic cigarette, stating it to be a very viable option for addicted smokers. You can read the full article on the Washington Times website by clicking here.

Media Coverage

2009-08-07T09:17:00.000-07:00

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Firm wants e-cigarettes to be considered tobacco, not drug

Submitted by SHNS on Fri, 08/14/2009 - 15:04

Electronic cigarettes don't contain tobacco or tar, but a Florida company is fighting for its high-tech substitutes to be identified as tobacco products, not drugs.

Why struggle to be grouped with a product vilified for killing millions of people each year? At least for Smoking Everywhere Inc., it would be a step up from having its product regulated as a drug.

Smoking Everywhere distributes e-cigarettes, which can't be lit and don't have tobacco. They are battery-operated and contain cartridges filled with nicotine, flavor and other chemicals. The steel tube that is made to look like a cigarette turns nicotine and water into a vapor that is inhaled.

Company representatives will be in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 17 for a hearing in federal district court to challenge the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which wants e-cigarettes labeled as drug devices under its jurisdiction. You can read the court documentation here.

You can read the remainder of this article here.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Friday, August 07, 2009

Experiences of Electronic Cigarette Users Suggest that These Could Be Life-Saving Devices and that They are Effective for Smoking Cessation

eSmoke Cartridges - Lab Tested and Diethylene Glycol free!

Posted on 7th Aug 2009 @ 5:26 PM

Maximum Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamine Levels in Various Cigarettes and Nicotine-Delivery Products (ng/g, except for nicotine gum and patch which are ng/patch or ng/gum piece)
Product	NNN	NNK	NAT	NAB	Total
Electronic Cigarette	3.87	1.46	2.16	0.693	8.183
Nicotine Gum	2.0	ND	ND	ND	2.0
Nicotine Patch	ND	8.0	ND	ND	8.0
Swedish Snus					2,400
Winston	2200	580	560	25	3365
Newport	1100	830	1900	55	3885
Camel	3100	1400	2800	150	7450
Skoal	4500	470	4100	220	9290
Marlboro	4300	1800	4900	190	11190

You can read the full article by Dr. Michael Siegel by clicking here

________________________________________________________________

Friday, July 31, 2009

List of Identified, Known Carcinogens in Electronic Cigarettes vs. Conventional Cigarettes, and Which Anti-Smoking Groups are Telling Smokers to Smoke

Based on the best available scientific evidence, I have compiled a list of the identified, known carcinogens present at greater than trace quantities in electronic cigarettes compared to conventional cigarettes.

Below that list is a table listing a number of anti-smoking organizations and which of the two products they have stated or implied they would prefer that smokers smoke.

Table 1. List of Identified, Known Carcinogens in Electronic Cigarettes, Present at More than Trace Levels (defined as 1 nanogram per cigarette)

None

Table 2. List of Identified, Known Carcinogens in Tobacco Cigarettes, Present at More than Trace Levels (defined as 1 nanogram per cigarette)

Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(j)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzo(a,l)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Quinolineb
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
Benzo(b)furan
Furan
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N -Nitrosoethylmethylamine
N -Nitrosodiethylamine
N -Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N -Nitrosopyrrolidine
N -Nitrosopiperidine
N -Nitrosodiethanolamine
N -Nitrosonornicotine
4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone
2-Toluidine
2,6-Dimethylaniline
2-Naphthylamine
4-Aminobiphenyl
AaC
PhIP
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
1,3-Butadiene
Isoprene
Benzene
Styrene
Acetamide
Acrylamide
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl chloride
DDT
DDE
Catechol
Caffeic acid
1,1-Dimethylhydrazine
2-Nitropropane
Nitrobenzene
Ethyl carbamate
Ethylene oxide
Propylene oxide
Methyleugenol
Hydrazine
Arsenic
Nickel
Chromium
Cadmium
Lead
Polonium-210

The rest of this story

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Comparison of Carcinogen Levels Shows that Electronic Cigarettes are Much Safer Than Conventional Ones

The FDA last week condemned electronic cigarettes on the basis that an FDA laboratory detected carcinogens (tobacco-specific nitrosamines) in the cartridges of several electronic cigarette manufacturers. The FDA held a press conference in which it attempted to scare electronic cigarette users into discontinuing e-cigarette use (and therefore a return to conventional cigarette smoking). In addition, a number of anti-smoking groups, including the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and American Lung Association, have called for a ban on these products due to this carcinogen scare.

The FDA (and the anti-smoking groups), however, failed to do three important things:

First, they failed to disclose the levels of tobacco-specific nitrosamines that were detected in the electronic cigarette cartridges.

Second, they failed to test the control product (a nicotine inhaler) to determine the carcinogen level in that product.

Third, they failed to report the tobacco-specific nitrosamine levels in conventional tobacco products, including cigarettes.

The rest of this story

Name: Michael Siegel

Location: Boston, Massachusetts

Michael Siegel ... I am a physician who specialized in preventive medicine and public health. I am now a professor in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health. I have 20 years of experience in tobacco control, primarily as a researcher. My areas of research interest include the health effects of secondhand smoke, policy aspects of regulating smoking in public places, effects of cigarette marketing on youth smoking behavior, and the evaluation of tobacco control program and policy interventions.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

BOSTON, July 27

Prominent Public Health Physicians and Tobacco Researchers Expose Double Standard in the FDA's Recent Study of Electronic Cigarettes and Challenge the FDA's Alarmist Attitude Toward the Devices

Contact: Thomas R. Kiklas, Director of Media, inLife LLC, 949-250-9600 ext 108, tkiklas@myinlife.com

BOSTON, July 27 /Standard Newswire/ -- The FDA recently went public with misleading information about the safety of electronic cigarettes and the marketing of the devices, not only using its clout but recruiting other prominent organizations to demonize a product that has great public health benefit potential.

A group of prominent doctors and tobacco researchers, including Dr. Michael Siegel at the Boston University School of Public Health, Dr. Joel Nitzkin of the AAPHP Tobacco Control Task Force, and Dr. Brad Rodu, Endowed Chair, Tobacco Harm Reduction Research University of Louisville, challenge the FDA to provide the full quantitative data of the study upon which the FDA has based its warning against electronic cigarettes. They are concerned that the FDA's disingenuous targeting of electronic cigarettes through a biased presentation of the scientific data has had significant negative impact upon the public perception of electronic cigarettes, when the best available evidence suggests that these have shown that the devices offer great potential to reduce serious health issues among traditional tobacco smokers.

The rest of this story

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

October 21st 2008

E-Cigarette Clinical Trials

Clinical trials have now been carried out in New Zealand by Dr Murray Laugeson of Health New Zealand.

The test found that the E-Cigarette was:

"...very safe relative to cigarettes, and also safe in absolute terms on all measurements we have applied. Using micro-electronics it vaporizes, separately for each puff, very small quantities of nicotine dissolved in propylene glycol, two small well-known molecules with excellent safety profiles, – into a fine aerosol. Each puff contains one third to one half the nicotine in a tobacco cigarette’s puff. The cartridge liquid is tobacco-free and no combustion occurs."

Source: Safety Report by Health New Zealand http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/extra%20info/e-cigarette-safety-report.pdf (PDF)

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Facing the Facts

2009-07-23T22:24:00.000-07:00

1) There are 1.1 billion smokers in the world today, and if current trends continue, that number is expected to increase to 1.6 billion by the year 2025.

2) China is home to 300 million smokers who consume approximately 1.7 trillion cigarettes a year, or 3 million cigarettes a minute.

3) Worldwide, approximately 10 million cigarettes are purchased a minute, 15 billion are sold each day, and upwards of 5 trillion are produced and used on an annual basis.

4) Five trillion cigarette filters weigh approximately 2 billion pounds.

5) It's estimated that trillions of filters, filled with toxic chemicals from tobacco smoke, make their way into our environment as discarded waste yearly.

6) While they may look like white cotton, cigarette filters are made of very thin fibers of a plastic called cellulose acetate. A cigarette filter can take between 18 months and 10 years to decompose.

7) A typical manufactured cigarette contains approximately 8 or 9 milligrams of nicotine, while the nicotine content of a cigar is 100 to 200 milligrams, with some as high as 400 milligrams.

8) There is enough nicotine in four or five cigarettes to kill an average adult if ingested whole. Most smokers take in only one or two milligrams of nicotine per cigarette however, with the remainder being burned off.

9) Ambergris, otherwise known as whale vomit is one of the hundreds of possible additives used in manufactured cigarettes.

10) Benzene is a known cause of acute myeloid leukemia, and cigarette smoke is a major source of benzene exposure. Among U.S. smokers, 90 percent of benzene exposures come from cigarettes.

11) Radioactive lead and polonium are both present in low levels in cigarette smoke.

12) Hydrogen cyanide, one of the toxic byproducts present in cigarette smoke, was used as a genocidal chemical agent during World War II.

13) Secondhand smoke contains more than 50 cancer-causing chemical compounds, 11 of which are known to be Group 1 carcinogens.

14) The smoke from a smoldering cigarette often contains higher concentrations of the toxins found in cigarette smoke than exhaled smoke does.

15) Kids are still picking up smoking at the alarming rate of 3,000 a day in the U.S., and 80,000 to 100,000 a day worldwide.

16) Worldwide, one in five teens age 13 to 15 smoke cigarettes.

17) Approximately one quarter of the youth alive in the Western Pacific Region (East Asia and the Pacific) today will die from tobacco use.

18) Half of all long-term smokers will die a tobacco-related death.

19) Every eight seconds, a human life is lost to tobacco use somewhere in the world. That translates to approximately 5 million deaths annually.

20) Tobacco use is expected to claim one billion lives this century unless serious anti-smoking efforts are made on a global level.

E- Cigarette Additives

2009-07-23T22:20:00.000-07:00

I figured it would be enlightening to list the ingredients of both the electronic cigarette and the tobacco products so that you can compare the two yourself.

Essential Oil, Virginia

Tobacco Absolute, Virginia

Tobacco Absolute, Burley

Orient Tobacco Absolute

Nicotine (from Tobacco Leaf)*

2,3,5-Trimethylpyrazine*

2,3-Dimethylpyrazine*

2,5-Dimethylpyrazine*

2-Ethylpyrazine

2-Acetylpyrazine*

4-(2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohex-2-Butene-4-ONE)*

BETAIONONE

LINALOOL*

MENTHOL*

METHYL BUTYRIC ACID(2-)*

ROSE OIL, BULGARIAN, TRUE OTTO*

Vanilla extract*

Octalactone (gamma-)*

Undecalactone (gamma-)*

PURE WATER*

PROPYLENE GLYCOL*

GLYCEROL*

all additives which have the asterisk are also found in the tobacco products on the market in Canada

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090722/fda_ecigarettes_090722/20090722?hub=Health

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090722/health/health_us_electronic_cigarettes_fda

A Right To Know

2009-07-23T20:53:00.000-07:00

I found this article to be quite interesting, so I wanted to share it with you. Please note the date on it, also take note of the 44 "selected poisons" in tobacco smoke and the reference to the 4,000 chemicals. Now, although this was a 'right to know' issue in July of 1998, I spent hours looking for a complete list and was unable to locate one anywhere.

It was with this in mind that I sent requests to the Canadian tobacco industry's “big 3” — Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., JTI-Macdonald Corp. and Rothmans, Benson and Hedges Inc. Since I have been denied any further right to choose which means of nicotine delivery service to utilize, I would at this time like to know exactly what is in these cigarettes I've been smoking for so long.

I can hardly wait to see their response, but I will most certainly be sharing them with you when they arrive, so stay tuned. If you would like to contact these companies, I have provided a means of contact on the "Manufacturer Contact" page. Please feel free to post their responses on this site if you like.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BMJ 1998;317:101 ( 11 July )

News

Cigarette ingredients must be revealed

David Spurgeon, Quebec

The Canadian province of British Columbia is to force tobacco companies to reveal the entire contents of their cigarettes, papers, and filters. The move by health minister Penny Priddy follows the recent decision to charge tobacco companies a licence fee to sell their products in the province.

Ms Priddy will also force the companies to submit reports on 44 "selected poisons" in tobacco smoke and may later require all ingredients to be listed on tobacco packaging. "British Columbia is imposing the strongest reporting demands in the world on the tobacco industry," she said. "There are 4000 chemicals in tobacco smoke, and people are entitled to know what they are."

Robert Parker, president of the Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers Council, said that the new regulations sound neither sensible nor reasonable. He said that the industry does not have the equipment to comply with the 15 September deadline for submission of additives and ingredients, and the 31 October deadline for the 44 poisons. The latter are to be assessed using test procedures developed by the federal health department. He said that the industry had not been consulted.

Fines may be imposed on companies that do not comply with the new regulations. Tobacco companies currently voluntarily provide the federal government with information on ingredients in cigarettes, but not in such detail and the information is not publicly available.

The following was a direct response to the above article

Its time to normalize control of tobacco products

Malcolm Dobbin (16 July 1998)

For historical reasons tobacco products have escaped the controls to which other products intended for human use are subject. Drugs, processed food and domestic chemicals are closely controlled, and a mandatory set of consumer information about ingredients, warning statements, and risk of use required to be included on the label.

There seems to be no good reason to exclude tobacco products from this labelling and consumer information requirement, except the limited ability to list 4000 chemicals because of the constraints of pack size.

Since cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventible mortality and morbidity, it makes good sense to provide the consumer, at the very least, with a list of chemicals known or likely to cause harm. The list could start with the 43 carcinogens so far identified by the IARC, as well as the other pharmacologically or physiologically active chemicals suspected of contributing to disease.

Some may argue that smokers already know that smoking is harmful, but I believe most smokers are unaware of the number of harmful chemicals identified so far in tobacco smoke. Smokers are a heterogeneous group, and many may be amazed and influenced by information about the rich panoply of harmful chemical ingredients and smoke constituents they are unwittingly inhaling.

This is a 'right to know' issue. Given current disclosures in internal tobacco company documents of their activities to conceal information from consumers, the time is right to take the sort of action proposed in British Columbia.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Manufacturer Contacts

2009-07-23T18:49:00.000-07:00

I have submitted a request for a complete additives list to the "Big 3" ... please feel free to do the same. Since I am no longer able to choose which product I use, I would really like to know exactly what is in the cigarettes I smoke each day and how they actually compare to the electronic cigarette.

Imperial Tobacco Canada

JTI Macdonald Corp

Rothmans, Benson and Hedges I nc

I'll post the responses for you as soon as I hear back.

Nicorette® Additives

2009-07-23T16:13:00.000-07:00

If you are looking to quit the Nicorette® Inhaler can help. Cravings happen because the body and brain are used to a steady supply of nicotine. When you stop smoking, intense nicotine withdrawal symptoms may set in. Smoking stimulates chemicals in your brain. It increases dopamine levels, which improves your mood. It even increases the levels of some hormones, including adrenaline.

Quitting cold-turkey seldom works because it does not address the physical cravings for nicotine, but this product helps relieve those cravings, while gradually weaning your body off nicotine. It provides a controlled amount of nicotine to your system at a slower, pace than cigarettes. and works as a temporary aid to help you quit smoking.

By using this product, 12 weeks from now you could be a non-smoker and is considered to be a safe, gradual way to wean your body off nicotine.

Oddly enough, the Nicorette Inhaler is a mouthpiece similar to a cigarette in appearance, with a replaceable nicotine cartridge. When you puff on the mouthpiece the cartridge releases nicotine to relieve your craving. Because this product is designed to be held like a cigarette, your hands are kept busy. Each cartridge supplies less nicotine than a cigarette and helps you avoid the harmful physical (irritation) and chemical (eg tars, carbon monoxide) effects associated with smoking.

Each fresh nicotine cartridge is placed between the two parts of the mouthpiece. When the two parts are clicked together, the cartridge seals are broken and the nicotine is available when the inhaler is used. Use of the inhaler can be with shallow puffs or with deep inhalations – either way is equally effective.

Each cartridge will last approximately 20 minutes of intense use. If you use the inhaler less intensively, then the cartridge may last longer. Individuals usually develop a technique which suits them best and gives them the best results.

One cartridge will not last the whole day ( you may feel you are still getting something from the cartridge but it is just residual flavour.)

Do NOT use if

you are continuing to smoke ! ( this may lead to nicotine overdosage)
you are pregnant or breastfeeding, unless on the advice of your doctor
you are a child
you suffer from active oesophagitis, inflammation of the mouth or pharynx, or gastric or peptic ulcers

Nicorette® Gum is available in 6 flavors ?

White Ice™ Mint—helps whiten teeth while you use it, coated for a cool mint flavor
Cinnamon Surge™—coated for an intense rush of bold cinnamon flavor
Fruit Chill™—coated twice for an intense fruit flavor with a hint of mint
FreshMint™—coated for a delicious burst of mint flavor
Mint
Original

I believe the Inhaler is only available in regular and Mint flavors at this time, but I would expect that the other flavors will mostly be readily available in the near future.

DIN (Drug Identification Number)

02241742

NICORETTE INHALER

What form(s) does Nicorette inhaler come in?

Nicorette Inhaler (nicotine inhalation system) consists of a mouthpiece and a plastic cartridge delivering 4 mg of nicotine from a porous polyethylene plug containing 10 mg nicotine. Nicotine is the active ingredient. Inactive components of the product are menthol, ethanol, and a porous plug which are pharmacologically inactive.

Some medications may have other generic brands available. Always ask your doctor or pharmacist about the safety of switching between brands of the same medication.

Who should NOT take Nicorette inhaler?

This medication should not be used by people who:

are allergic to nicotine, menthol, ethanol, or any ingredients of the medication
are non-smokers or occasional smokers
are under 18 years of age
are pregnant or breast-feeding
have just had a heart attack
have life-threatening arrhythmias (abnormal heart rhythm)
have severe or worsening angina (chest pain)
have recently had a stroke

What side effects are possible with Nicorette inhaler?

The side effects listed below are not experienced by everyone who takes this medication. If you are concerned about side effects, discuss the risks and benefits of this medication with your doctor. Your health professional may be able to help you deal with some of the effects.

The following side effects may go away as your body becomes used to the medication; check with your doctor if they continue or become bothersome.

More common

coughing
indigestion
mouth and throat irritation
stuffy nose
headache
stomach discomfort
nausea

Less common
anxiety back pain change in taste sensations chest pain depression diarrhea difficulty sleeping dizziness feeling of burning, numbness, tightness, tingling, warmth, or heat feelings of drug dependence	flu-like symptoms general pain hiccups pain in jaw and neck pain in muscles passing of gas problems with teeth thirst unusual tiredness or weakness vomiting

Check with your doctor as soon as possible if any of the following side effects occur:

Less common

fast or irregular heartbeat
fever with or without chills
headache
nausea with or without vomiting
runny nose
shortness of breath, tightness in chest, difficulty breathing, or wheezing
skin rash, itching, or hives
tearing of eyes
chest pain

Symptoms of overdose

abdominal or stomach pain
cold sweat
confusion
convulsions (seizures)
disturbed hearing and vision
drooling
extreme exhaustion
pale skin
fast heartbeat
tremors

Some people may experience side effects other than those listed. Check with your doctor if you notice any symptom that worries you while you are taking this medication.

Are there any other precautions or warnings for Nicorette inhaler?

Medical conditions: If using this medication, people with asthma, thyroid conditions, diabetes, stomach ulcers, heart disease, or blood vessel disease should be closely monitored by their doctors.

Pregnancy: This medication is not recommended for pregnant women. If you are or may be pregnant, talk to your doctor.

Breast-feeding: It is not known whether this medication passes into breast milk. If you are breast-feeding, speak to your doctor about the benefits and risks of using this medication.

Children and adolescents: The safety and effectiveness of this medication have not been established for people under 18 years of age. The cartridges and all parts of the nicotine inhaler should be kept away from children, as they may cause poisoning or choking.

What other drugs could interact with Nicorette inhaler?

The following medications may affect how this medication works, be affected by this medication, or increase the risk of side effects:

clomipramine
clozapine
fluvoxamine
imipramine
olanzapine
tacrine
theophylline

If you are taking any of these medications, speak with your doctor or pharmacist. Depending on your specific circumstances, your doctor may want you to:

stop taking one of the medications,
change one of the medications to another,
change how you are taking one or both of the medications, or
leave everything as is.

An interaction between two medications does not always mean that you must stop taking one of them. In many cases, interactions are intended or are managed by close monitoring. Speak to your doctor about how any drug interactions are being managed or should be managed.

Medications other than those listed above may interact with this medication. Tell your doctor or prescriber about all prescription, over-the-counter (non-prescription), and herbal medications that you are taking. Also tell them about any supplements you take. Since caffeine, alcohol, the nicotine from cigarettes, or street drugs can affect the action of many medications, you should let your prescriber know if you use them.

Cigarette Additives

2009-07-23T16:02:00.000-07:00

I found this fairly complete list of additives found in your favorite cigarette brand and wanted to share:

• Acetanisole
• Acetic Acid
• Acetoin
• Acetophenone
• 6-Acetoxydihydrotheaspirane
• 2-Acetyl-3- Ethylpyrazine
• 2-Acetyl-5-Methylfuran
• Acetylpyrazine
• 2-Acetylpyridine
• 3-Acetylpyridine
• 2-Acetylthiazole
• Aconitic Acid
• dl-Alanine
• Alfalfa Extract
• Allspice Extract,Oleoresin, and Oil
• Allyl Hexanoate
• Allyl Ionone
• Almond Bitter Oil
• Ambergris Tincture
• Ammonia
• Ammonium Bicarbonate
• Ammonium Hydroxide
• Ammonium Phosphate Dibasic
• Ammonium Sulfide
• Amyl Alcohol
• Amyl Butyrate
• Amyl Formate
• Amyl Octanoate
• alpha-Amylcinnamaldehyde
• Amyris Oil
• trans-Anethole
• Angelica Root Extract, Oil and Seed Oil
• Anise
• Anise Star, Extract and Oils
• Anisyl Acetate
• Anisyl Alcohol
• Anisyl Formate
• Anisyl Phenylacetate
• Apple Juice Concentrate, Extract, and Skins
• Apricot Extract and Juice Concentrate
• 1-Arginine
• Asafetida Fluid Extract And Oil
• Ascorbic Acid
• 1-Asparagine Monohydrate
• 1-Aspartic Acid
• Balsam Peru and Oil
• Basil Oil
• Bay Leaf, Oil and Sweet Oil
• Beeswax White
• Beet Juice Concentrate
• Benzaldehyde
• Benzaldehyde Glyceryl Acetal
• Benzoic Acid, Benzoin
• Benzoin Resin
• Benzophenone
• Benzyl Alcohol
• Benzyl Benzoate
• Benzyl Butyrate
• Benzyl Cinnamate
• Benzyl Propionate
• Benzyl Salicylate
• Bergamot Oil
• Bisabolene
• Black Currant Buds Absolute
• Borneol
• Bornyl Acetate
• Buchu Leaf Oil
• 1,3-Butanediol
• 2,3-Butanedione
• 1-Butanol
• 2-Butanone
• 4(2-Butenylidene)-3,5,5-Trimethyl-2-Cyclohexen-1-One
• Butter, Butter Esters, and Butter Oil
• Butyl Acetate
• Butyl Butyrate
• Butyl Butyryl Lactate
• Butyl Isovalerate
• Butyl Phenylacetate
• Butyl Undecylenate
• 3-Butylidenephthalide
• Butyric Acid]
• Cadinene
• Caffeine
• Calcium Carbonate
• Camphene
• Cananga Oil
• Capsicum Oleoresin
• Caramel Color
• Caraway Oil
• Carbon Dioxide
• Cardamom Oleoresin, Extract, Seed Oil, and Powder
• Carob Bean and Extract
• beta-Carotene
• Carrot Oil
• Carvacrol
• 4-Carvomenthenol
• 1-Carvone
• beta-Caryophyllene
• beta-Caryophyllene Oxide
• Cascarilla Oil and Bark Extract
• Cassia Bark Oil
• Cassie Absolute and Oil
• Castoreum Extract, Tincture and Absolute
• Cedar Leaf Oil
• Cedarwood Oil Terpenes and Virginiana
• Cedrol
• Celery Seed Extract, Solid, Oil, And Oleoresin
• Cellulose Fiber
• Chamomile Flower Oil And Extract
• Chicory Extract
• Chocolate
• Cinnamaldehyde
• Cinnamic Acid
• Cinnamon Leaf Oil, Bark Oil, and Extract
• Cinnamyl Acetate
• Cinnamyl Alcohol
• Cinnamyl Cinnamate
• Cinnamyl Isovalerate
• Cinnamyl Propionate
• Citral
• Citric Acid
• Citronella Oil
• dl-Citronellol
• Citronellyl Butyrate
• itronellyl Isobutyrate
• Civet Absolute
• Clary Oil
• Clover Tops, Red Solid Extract
• Cocoa
• Cocoa Shells, Extract, Distillate And Powder
• Coconut Oil
• Coffee
• Cognac White and Green Oil
• Copaiba Oil
• Coriander Extract and Oil
• Corn Oil
• Corn Silk
• Costus Root Oil
• Cubeb Oil
• Cuminaldehyde
• para-Cymene
• 1-Cysteine Dandelion Root Solid Extract
• Davana Oil
• 2-trans, 4-trans-Decadienal
• delta-Decalactone
• gamma-Decalactone
• Decanal
• Decanoic Acid
• 1-Decanol
• 2-Decenal
• Dehydromenthofurolactone
• Diethyl Malonate
• Diethyl Sebacate
• 2,3-Diethylpyrazine
• Dihydro Anethole
• 5,7-Dihydro-2-Methylthieno(3,4-D) Pyrimidine
• Dill Seed Oil and Extract
• meta-Dimethoxybenzene
• para-Dimethoxybenzene
• 2,6-Dimethoxyphenol
• Dimethyl Succinate
• 3,4-Dimethyl-1,2 Cyclopentanedione
• 3,5- Dimethyl-1,2-Cyclopentanedione
• 3,7-Dimethyl-1,3,6-Octatriene
• 4,5-Dimethyl-3-Hydroxy-2,5-
Dihydrofuran-2-One
• 6,10-Dimethyl-5,9-Undecadien-
2-One
• 3,7-Dimethyl-6-Octenoic Acid
• 2,4 Dimethylacetophenone
• alpha,para-Dimethylbenzyl Alcohol
• alpha,alpha-Dimethylphenethyl Acetate
• alpha,alpha Dimethylphenethyl Butyrate
• 2,3-Dimethylpyrazine
• 2,5-Dimethylpyrazine
• 2,6-Dimethylpyrazine
• Dimethyltetrahydrobenzofuranone
• delta-Dodecalactone
• gamma-Dodecalactone
• para-Ethoxybenzaldehyde
• Ethyl 10-Undecenoate
• Ethyl 2-Methylbutyrate
• Ethyl Acetate
• Ethyl Acetoacetate
• Ethyl Alcohol
• Ethyl Benzoate
• Ethyl Butyrate
• Ethyl Cinnamate
• Ethyl Decanoate
• Ethyl Fenchol
• Ethyl Furoate
• Ethyl Heptanoate
• Ethyl Hexanoate
• Ethyl Isovalerate
• Ethyl Lactate
• Ethyl Laurate
• Ethyl Levulinate
• Ethyl Maltol
• Ethyl Methyl Phenylglycidate
• Ethyl Myristate
• Ethyl Nonanoate
• Ethyl Octadecanoate
• Ethyl Octanoate

• Ethyl Oleate
• Ethyl Palmitate
• Ethyl Phenylacetate
• Ethyl Propionate
• Ethyl Salicylate
• Ethyl trans-2-Butenoate
• Ethyl Valerate
• Ethyl Vanillin
• 2-Ethyl (or Methyl)-(3,5 and 6)-Methoxypyrazine
• 2-Ethyl-1-Hexanol, 3-Ethyl -2 -
Hydroxy-2-Cyclopenten-1-One
• 2-Ethyl-3, (5 or 6)-Dimethylpyrazine
• 5-Ethyl-3-Hydroxy-4-Methyl-2 (5H)-Furanone
• 2-Ethyl-3-Methylpyrazine
• 4-Ethylbenzaldehyde
• 4-Ethylguaiacol
• para-Ethylphenol
• 3-Ethylpyridine
• Eucalyptol
• Farnesol
• D-Fenchone
• Fennel Sweet Oil
• Fenugreek, Extract, Resin, and Absolute
• Fig Juice Concentrate
• Food Starch Modified
• Furfuryl Mercaptan
• 4-(2-Furyl)-3-Buten-2-One
• Galbanum Oil
• Genet Absolute
• Gentian Root Extract
• Geraniol
• Geranium Rose Oil
• Geranyl Acetate
• Geranyl Butyrate
• Geranyl Formate
• Geranyl Isovalerate
• Geranyl Phenylacetate
• Ginger Oil and Oleoresin
• 1-Glutamic Acid
• 1-Glutamine
• Glycerol
• Glycyrrhizin Ammoniated
• Grape Juice Concentrate
• Guaiac Wood Oil
• Guaiacol
• Guar Gum
• 2,4-Heptadienal
• gamma-Heptalactone
• Heptanoic Acid
• 2-Heptanone
• 3-Hepten-2-One
• 2-Hepten-4-One
• 4-Heptenal
• trans -2-Heptenal
• Heptyl Acetate
• omega-6-Hexadecenlactone
• gamma-Hexalactone
• Hexanal
• Hexanoic Acid
• 2-Hexen-1-Ol
• 3-Hexen-1-Ol
• cis-3-Hexen-1-Yl Acetate
• 2-Hexenal
• 3-Hexenoic Acid
• trans-2-Hexenoic Acid
• cis-3-Hexenyl Formate
• Hexyl 2-Methylbutyrate
• Hexyl Acetate
• Hexyl Alcohol
• Hexyl Phenylacetate
• 1-Histidine
• Honey
• Hops Oil
• Hydrolyzed Milk Solids
• Hydrolyzed Plant Proteins
• 5-Hydroxy-2,4-Decadienoic Acid delta-Lactone
• 4-Hydroxy-2,5-Dimethyl-3(2H)-Furanone
• 2-Hydroxy-3,5,5-Trimethyl-2-Cyclohexen-1-One
• 4-Hydroxy -3-Pentenoic Acid Lactone
• 2-Hydroxy-4-Methylbenzaldehyde
• 4-Hydroxybutanoic Acid Lactone
• Hydroxycitronellal
• 6-Hydroxydihydrotheaspirane
• 4-(para-Hydroxyphenyl)-2-Butanone
• Hyssop Oil
• Immortelle Absolute and Extract
• alpha-Ionone
• beta-Ionone
• alpha-Irone
• Isoamyl Acetate
• Isoamyl Benzoate
• Isoamyl Butyrate
• Isoamyl Cinnamate
• Isoamyl Formate, IsoamylHexanoate
• Isoamyl Isovalerate
• Isoamyl Octanoate
• Isoamyl Phenylacetate
• Isobornyl Acetate
• Isobutyl Acetate
• Isobutyl Alcohol
• Isobutyl Cinnamate
• Isobutyl Phenylacetate
• Isobutyl Salicylate
• 2-Isobutyl-3-Methoxypyrazine
• alpha-Isobutylphenethyl Alcohol
• Isobutyraldehyde
• Isobutyric Acid
• d,l-Isoleucine
• alpha-Isomethylionone
• 2-Isopropylphenol
• Isovaleric Acid
• Jasmine Absolute, Concrete and Oil
• Kola Nut Extract
• Labdanum Absolute and Oleoresin
• Lactic Acid
• Lauric Acid
• Lauric Aldehyde
• Lavandin Oil
• Lavender Oil
• Lemon Oil and Extract
• Lemongrass Oil
• 1-Leucine
• Levulinic Acid
• Licorice Root, Fluid, Extract
and Powder
• Lime Oil
• Linalool
• Linalool Oxide
• Linalyl Acetate
• Linden Flowers
• Lovage Oil And Extract
• 1-Lysine]
• Mace Powder, Extract and Oil
• Magnesium Carbonate
• Malic Acid
• Malt and Malt Extract
• Maltodextrin
• Maltol
• Maltyl Isobutyrate
• Mandarin Oil
• Maple Syrup and Concentrate
• Mate Leaf, Absolute and Oil
• para-Mentha-8-Thiol-3-One
• Menthol
• Menthone
• Menthyl Acetate
• dl-Methionine
• Methoprene
• 2-Methoxy-4-Methylphenol
• 2-Methoxy-4-Vinylphenol
• para-Methoxybenzaldehyde
• 1-(para-Methoxyphenyl)-1-Penten-3-One
• 4-(para-Methoxyphenyl)-2-Butanone
• 1-(para-Methoxyphenyl)-2-Propanone
• Methoxypyrazine
• Methyl 2-Furoate
• Methyl 2-Octynoate
• Methyl 2-Pyrrolyl Ketone
• Methyl Anisate
• Methyl Anthranilate
• Methyl Benzoate
• Methyl Cinnamate
• Methyl Dihydrojasmonate
• Methyl Ester of Rosin, Partially Hydrogenated
• Methyl Isovalerate
• Methyl Linoleate (48%)
• Methyl Linolenate (52%) Mixture
• Methyl Naphthyl Ketone
• Methyl Nicotinate
• Methyl Phenylacetate
• Methyl Salicylate
• Methyl Sulfide
• 3-Methyl-1-Cyclopentadecanone
• 4-Methyl-1-Phenyl-2-Pentanone
• 5-Methyl-2-Phenyl-2-Hexenal
• 5-Methyl-2-Thiophene-carboxaldehyde
• 6-Methyl-3,-5-Heptadien-2-One
• 2-Methyl-3-(para-Isopropylphenyl) Propionaldehyde
• 5-Methyl-3-Hexen-2-One
• 1-Methyl-3Methoxy-4-Isopropylbenzene
• 4-Methyl-3-Pentene-2-One
• 2-Methyl-4-Phenylbutyraldehyde
• 6-Methyl-5-Hepten-2-One
• 4-Methyl-5-Thiazoleethanol
• 4-Methyl-5-Vinylthiazole
• Methyl-alpha-Ionone
• Methyl-trans-2-Butenoic Acid
• 4-Methylacetophenone
• para-Methylanisole
• alpha-Methylbenzyl Acetate
• alpha-Methylbenzyl Alcohol
• 2-Methylbutyraldehyde
• 3-Methylbutyraldehyde
• 2-Methylbutyric Acid
• alpha-Methylcinnamaldehyde
• Methylcyclopentenolone
• 2-Methylheptanoic Acid
• 2-Methylhexanoic Acid
• 3-Methylpentanoic Acid
• 4-Methylpentanoic Acid
• 2-Methylpyrazine
• 5-Methylquinoxaline
• 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran-3-One
• (Methylthio)Methylpyrazine (Mixture Of Isomers)

• 3-Methylthiopropionaldehyde
• Methyl 3-Methylthiopropionate
• 2-Methylvaleric Acid
• Mimosa Absolute and Extract
• Molasses Extract and Tincture
• Mountain Maple Solid Extract
• Mullein Flowers
• Myristaldehyde
• Myristic Acid
• Myrrh Oil
• beta-Napthyl Ethyl Ether
• Nerol
• Neroli Bigarde Oil
• Nerolidol
• Nona-2-trans,6-cis-Dienal
• 2,6-Nonadien-1-Ol
• gamma-Nonalactone
• Nonanal
• Nonanoic Acid
• Nonanone
• trans-2-Nonen-1-Ol
• 2-Nonenal
• Nonyl Acetate
• Nutmeg Powder and Oil
• Oak Chips Extract and Oil
• Oak Moss Absolute
• 9,12-Octadecadienoic Acid (48%)
And 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic Acid (52%)
• delta-Octalactone
• gamma-Octalactone
• Octanal
• Octanoic Acid
• 1-Octanol
• 2-Octanone
• 3-Octen-2-One
• 1-Octen-3-Ol
• 1-Octen-3-Yl Acetate
• 2-Octenal
• Octyl Isobutyrate
• Oleic Acid
• Olibanum Oil
• Opoponax Oil And Gum
• Orange Blossoms Water, Absolute, and Leaf Absolute
• Orange Oil and Extract
• Origanum Oil
• Orris Concrete Oil and Root
Extract
• Palmarosa Oil
• Palmitic Acid
• Parsley Seed Oil
• Patchouli Oil
• omega-Pentadecalactone
• 2,3-Pentanedione
• 2-Pentanone
• 4-Pentenoic Acid
• 2-Pentylpyridine
• Pepper Oil, Black And White
• Peppermint Oil
• Peruvian (Bois De Rose) Oil
• Petitgrain Absolute, Mandarin Oil and Terpeneless Oil
• alpha-Phellandrene
• 2-Phenenthyl Acetate
• Phenenthyl Alcohol
• Phenethyl Butyrate
• Phenethyl Cinnamate
• Phenethyl Isobutyrate
• Phenethyl Isovalerate
• Phenethyl Phenylacetate
• Phenethyl Salicylate
• 1-Phenyl-1-Propanol
• 3-Phenyl-1-Propanol
• 2-Phenyl-2-Butenal
• 4-Phenyl-3-Buten-2-Ol
• 4-Phenyl-3-Buten-2-One
• Phenylacetaldehyde
• Phenylacetic Acid
• 1-Phenylalanine
• 3-Phenylpropionaldehyde
• 3-Phenylpropionic Acid
• 3-Phenylpropyl Acetate
• 3-Phenylpropyl Cinnamate
• 2-(3-Phenylpropyl)Tetrahydrofuran
• Phosphoric Acid
• Pimenta Leaf Oil
• Pine Needle Oil, Pine Oil, Scotch
• Pineapple Juice Concentrate
• alpha-Pinene, beta-Pinene
• D-Piperitone
• Piperonal
• Pipsissewa Leaf Extract
• Plum Juice
• Potassium Sorbate
• 1-Proline
• Propenylguaethol
• Propionic Acid
• Propyl Acetate
• Propyl para-Hydroxybenzoate
• Propylene Glycol
• 3-Propylidenephthalide
• Prune Juice and Concentrate
• Pyridine
• Pyroligneous Acid And Extract
• Pyrrole
• Pyruvic Acid
• Raisin Juice Concentrate
• Rhodinol
• Rose Absolute and Oil
• Rosemary Oil
• Rum
• Rum Ether
• Rye Extract
• Sage, Sage Oil, and Sage
Oleoresin
• Salicylaldehyde
• Sandalwood Oil, Yellow
• Sclareolide
• Skatole
• Smoke Flavor
• Snakeroot Oil
• Sodium Acetate
• Sodium Benzoate
• Sodium Bicarbonate
• Sodium Carbonate
• Sodium Chloride
• Sodium Citrate
• Sodium Hydroxide
• Solanone
• Spearmint Oil
• Styrax Extract, Gum and Oil
• Sucrose Octaacetate
• Sugar Alcohols
• Sugars
• Tagetes Oil
• Tannic Acid
• Tartaric Acid
• Tea Leaf and Absolute
• alpha-Terpineol
• Terpinolene
• Terpinyl Acetate
• 5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline
• 1,5,5,9-Tetramethyl-13-Oxatricyclo(8.3.0.0(4,9))Tridecane
• 2,3,4,5, and 3,4,5,6-
Tetramethylethyl-Cyclohexanone
• 2,3,5,6-Tetramethylpyrazine
• Thiamine Hydrochloride
• Thiazole
• 1-Threonine
• Thyme Oil, White and Red
• Thymol
• Tobacco Extracts
• Tochopherols (mixed)
• Tolu Balsam Gum and Extract
• Tolualdehydes
• para-Tolyl 3-Methylbutyrate
• para-Tolyl Acetaldehyde
• para-Tolyl Acetate
• para-Tolyl Isobutyrate
• para-Tolyl Phenylacetate
• Triacetin
• 2-Tridecanone
• 2-Tridecenal
• Triethyl Citrate
• 3,5,5-Trimethyl -1-Hexanol
• para,alpha,alpha-Trimethylbenzyl Alcohol
• 4-(2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohex-1-
Enyl)But-2-En-4-One
• 2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohex-2-
Ene-1,4-Dione
• 2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohexa-1,
3-Dienyl Methan
• 4-(2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohexa-1,
3-Dienyl)But-2-En-4-One
• 2,2,6-Trimethylcyclohexanone
• 2,3,5-Trimethylpyrazine
• 1-Tyrosine
• delta-Undercalactone
• gamma-Undecalactone
• Undecanal
• 2-Undecanone, 1
• 0-Undecenal
• Urea
• Valencene
• Valeraldehyde
• Valerian Root Extract, Oil
and Powder
• Valeric Acid
• gamma-Valerolactone
• Valine
• Vanilla Extract And Oleoresin
• Vanillin
• Veratraldehyde
• Vetiver Oil
• Vinegar
• Violet Leaf Absolute
• Walnut Hull Extract
• Water
• Wheat Extract And Flour
• Wild Cherry Bark Extract
• Wine and Wine Sherry
• Xanthan Gum
• 3,4-Xylenol
• Yeast

Exposed FDA Double Standard

2009-07-23T09:47:00.000-07:00

Prominent Public Health Physicians and Tobacco Researchers Expose Double Standard in the FDA’s Recent Study of Electronic Cigarettes and Challenge the FDA’s Alarmist Attitude Toward the Devices

July 27, 2009 11:14 am
This article courtesy of Instead Electronic Cigarettes

BOSTON, July 27 — The FDA recently went public with misleading information about the safety of electronic cigarettes and the marketing of the devices, not only using its clout but recruiting other prominent organizations to demonize a product that has great public health benefit potential.

A group of prominent doctors and tobacco researchers, including Dr. Michael Siegel at the Boston University School of Public Health, Dr. Joel Nitzkin of the AAPHP Tobacco Control Task Force, and Dr. Brad Rodu, Endowed Chair, Tobacco Harm Reduction Research University of Louisville, challenge the FDA to provide the full quantitative data of the study upon which the FDA has based its warning against electronic cigarettes. They are concerned that the FDA’s disingenuous targeting of electronic cigarettes through a biased presentation of the scientific data has had significant negative impact upon the public perception of electronic cigarettes, when the best available evidence suggests that these have shown that the devices offer great potential to reduce serious health issues among traditional tobacco smokers.

In a July 22 news release, the FDA cited the detectable presence of carcinogens and “toxic chemicals” in a “small sample” of electronic cigarette cartridges as reason for alarm, singling out nitrosamines as particularly toxic. What the FDA fails to inform the public is that detectable amounts of carcinogens are also present in nicotine replacement products such as NicoDerm CQ and Nicorette gum, both approved by the FDA, and nitrosamines that can be also found in food items such bacon and beer. This double standard and alarmist attitude has had the significant and unfortunate effect of inducing hysteria among the public, discouraging tobacco smokers from using a product which is thought to be a significantly safer alternative to traditional tobacco.

Regrettably, the FDA has used biased reporting of this small and inconclusive study, the complete results of which have not been made public, to secure the vocal support of groups such as the American Academy of Pediatrics Tobacco Consortium, the Institute for Global Health, and the American Lung Association in their attack on electronic cigarettes. These researchers argue that it is absurd to consider taking electronic cigarettes off the market when it is the conventional ones which have been shown to be killing people. Further, the electronic cigarette community calls for accurate and fair reporting relative to the findings and statements of prominent medical professionals in favor of this new and important technology and challenges the media to tell the other side of the story.

“The FDA’s laboratory findings actually indicate that electronic cigarettes are much, much safer than conventional cigarettes,” says Dr. Michael Siegel. “The traces of carcinogens present are also present in nicotine replacement products. The FDA and the anti-smoking groups have fallen into a huge analytical trap as they have failed to ask the appropriate question. The question they are asking is: ‘Are electronic cigarettes safe?’ That is not the right question. The right question is: ‘Are electronic cigarettes much safer than traditional ones?’”

Dr. Rodu states, “The FDA tested e-cigarettes for TSNAs using a questionable sampling regimen, and the methods that were so sensitive that the results may have no possible significance to users. The agency failed to report specific levels of these contaminants, and it has failed to conduct similar testing of nicotine medicines that have been sold in the U.S. for over 20 years. These are not the actions of an agency that is science-based and consumer-focused. These pseudo-scientific actions are clearly intended to form the justification for banning a category of products that are probably 99.9% safer than cigarettes.”

Dr. Joel Nitzkin speaking as individual states, “The newly adopted FDA/Tobacco legislation will give full FDA approval to currently marketed conventional cigarettes. The new law encourages cigarette companies to produce new “reduced exposure” cigarettes to be marketed as reduced exposure products, with no scientific evidence that such reductions in exposure will reduce risk of future tobacco related illness and death. In the context of these provisions of the newly adopted FDA/Tobacco bill — FDA should be encouraging, not maligning the manufacture and sale of electronic cigarettes, and working with manufacturers to assure the highest possible quality control.”

###

For more information and interviews, contact:

Michael Siegel, MD, MPH
Professor
Department of Community Health Sciences
Boston University School of Public Health
617-638-5167
Email: mbsiegel@bu.edu

Joel L. Nitzkin, MD, MPH, DPA
Chair AAPHP Tobacco Control Task Force
Phone: 504 899 7893 or 800 598 2561
Fax: 504 899 7557
jln-md@mindspring.com
www.aaphp.org

Brad Rodu
Professor of Medicine
Endowed Chair, Tobacco Harm Reduction Research
University of Louisville
Phone: 502-561-7273
Email: brad.rodu@louisville.edu
http://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com